The vacant position the Minister of Finance drew attention of many
circles who urge President SBY to immediately appoint a definite Minister of
Finance. Firmly the Parliament insisted that the office of Acting Finance
Minister lasted not any longer than one month. If the Acting Minister could not
make any decision, it was feared that it would hold back the development
process as a whole considering the strategic post of the Minister of Finance.
In the eyes of the Parliament, the appointment of Coordinating Minister
of Economy Hatta Rajasa as Acting Minister of Finance was acceptable; but for
not any longer than one month because if the post were held by the acting
Minister, it would interrupt his performance.
It was noteworthy that the case of vacant office of the Ministry of
Finance was a potential polemics; rumors had it that Acting Finance Minister
Hatta Radjasa had Presidential authority to take strategic decisions at the
Ministry of Finance.
The Parliament was expecting that President SBY would take this case
into serious consideration. If it was left to drag on it could endanger the
effectiveness and good governance of the SBY administration. The House even
bluntly questioned why the President did not instantly appoint a definitive
Minister of Finance. A definitive Minister of Finance was of utmost importance
because he had to make important decisions or make new Regulations of the
Ministry of Finance or Finalize regulations still in process.
In case of Acting Minister, he had no authority to make strategic
decisions. If the acting Minister dared to make strategic decisions, the
Parliament would take action; the reason was that only the definitive Minister
of Finance could make strategic decision.
To simulate, House had asked President SBY to immediately appoint a
definitive Minister of Finance before discussing budget matters with House.
This was important because it was a matter of inter-institutional relationship.
According to House, only the definitive Minister could represent the President
in the process of Budget Planning or Budget revision with House. The authority
could not be delegated; meanwhile the case of acting Minister of Finance would
be dealt with the legal way.
In Law no. 17 2013 on State Finance Article 6 paragraph 1 it was
mentioned that the President as Head of Government commanded state’s financial
management as part of Government’s authority. And in Paragraph 2 point a it was
mentioned that authority of state finance management was delegated to the
Ministry of Finance as fiscal Manager and Representative of the Government.
Meaning, the status of Acting Minister was not regulated by the Law. The legal
base was weak; therefore a definitive Ministry of Finance was indispensable.
According to the politicians in House, supposedly it was not difficult
for the President to appoint a definitive Ministry of Finance. Supposedly by
the time President SBY proposed Agus Martowardjo as candidate of Governor of
Bank Indonesia, the President already had in mind who the successor was going
to be.
Succession of Agus as Ministry of Finance based on Decree of President
SBY no 44/M/2013 signed on April 17, 2013. By that decree President SBY
expressed his appreciation and gratitude to Agus Martowardjo for his service
and dedication while holding the office as Minister.
The appointment of Hatta Rajasa as Acting Minister of Finance was
written in Presidential Decree no 45/M/2013 signed by President SBY effective
on the day of issuance, in which the Keppress authorized Hatta as executor of
duties.
About the reasoning why Hatta was appointed as Acting Minister,
Presidential spokesperson Julian Aldrin Pasha stated that the Coordinating
Minister in Economy was rated by President as the right figure to hold the
office. So far, as coordinating Minister Hatta regulated, and commanded over
the knowledge of all affairs at the Ministry. The decision was based on the
consideration that the position was only temporary and therefore Mr. Hatta was
regarded as the right person to undertake the duty as Finance Minister.
About some political suspicion by some political parties outside the
coalition that the appointment of Hatta was probably because he was the
chairman of a certain political party, it was rated as irrelevant because the
holding of office was only temporary. But just because it was temporary, the
Parliament expected that the President immediately appoint a definitive Finance
Minister.
It was noteworthy that as Acting Minister, Hatta assured there shall be
no drastic change as long as he was in office. He assured that the policy made
by Agus Marto would be certain tasks to be prioritized. For example budget
spending in ministries and institutions must run smoothly. Also some problems
such as deficit budget in the oil gas sector and lowered export must be
overcome.
Hatta also disclosed some challenges he had to face in doing his duties
as acting Finance Minister. One of them was budget absorption by ministries and
institutions. Hatta said that to speed up settlement of documents of budget
liquidation would be the Ministry’s focus of attention in the future.
According to Hatta the ministry of Finance must actively coordinate with
ministries to troubleshoot the problems, this is to avoid the application of
“astrology” in management, i.e. the need for signatures in certain expenditure
posts which could not be passed unless signed.
One of the astrology problems that recently emerged was the stagnated
fund of the Ministry Defense at the Ministry of Finance. The Ministry of
Defense was unable to liquidate fund of Rp 678 billion because the budget was
frozen until further notice. Based on Letter of The Ministry of Finance no
S-2133/AG/2012 the fund was given a sign of star at House, which means that it
could not be liquidated until further notice.
Furthermore another homework left by Agus was policy related to
financing of the megaproject of the strategic zone at the Sunda Straits Bridge
[KSIS]. This Java-Sumatra bridge [JSS] which was public highlight was included
in the megaproject. This was interesting because once the megaproject triggered
different opinion between Hatta and Agus in regard to initial project financing
i.e.feasibility study.
Agus wished the Government participated in the financing of the
feasibility study. He wished there was a portion of Government budget in it.
This was to make sure that the feasibility study was carried out in the spirit
of Good Governance and be accountable.
Unlike Agus, Hatta Rajasa wished that 100% of the financing be burdened
on the private sector, so as not to burden state budget. However, Hatta would
not tinker around with the proposal; it would be best to leave it to the
definite Minister of Finance who would continue the task until the end of the
Cabinet’s office.
To keep the market from responding negatively to the vacant chair, it
would be most advisable for President SBY to appoint a definite Finance
Minister to cool down speculations which tend to be negative. (SS)
Business News - May 01,2013
No comments:
Post a Comment