The ministry of cooperatives and small business had been striving to
promote UKM by various strategies among them through cooperation with
universities. Choirul Djamhari, Deputy Manager of Restructurization and
business development of kemenkop and UKM on Tuesday [30/4] reported that 20
incubators of the universities were ready to execute the UKM development
program to prove their participation and support for the human resources
capacity upgrading program of the real sector.
Choirul disclosed that UKM as incubator tenant in universities were
categorized in 3 groups according to their business line. This was to make sure
that their specialization could be handled by the incubator manager, hence
technical guideline and counseling could be more focused. Moreover there was
obligation by the manager that the UKM could identify their problems, so that
handing could be more productive. However business incubators at the
universities needed to procure facilities for incubation such as laboratories
and consultation room where tenants could be served.
The competence of consultants was expected to be in accordance with
business line grouping as needed by tenants. The process of UKM tenant
recruitment even had to pass selection stage to detect specific things. In
addition to that the relationship between business incubator manager with
related office commanding cooperatives and UKM, institutions and stakeholders
must be stepped up. He believed that concern fore UKM could be realized by
motivating them to elevate their business class. “We have agreed to guide them
whenever they need us” Choirul remarked.
Meanwhile Chairman of the Indonesian F&B Traders [Gapmmi] Adhi S.
Lukman rated that UKM rarely had trainings in market research to support their
marketing plan. Normally what was being conducted was only technical training
like the making of a product. Amidst tight market competition UKM needed
training in undertaking simple market survey. So far they had only been tying
to probe the market he added on that 85% of output of food products were
produced by big companies while UKM only had 15% share. However in terms of
absolute number, the numbers of big companies were less than 1% of UKM.
According to Adhi, supposedly the government could facilitate UKM who
did not have legal identify to have trainings in survey. They did not have
legal identity as the business they ran frequently opened and closed. He said
that in fact UKM were sustainer of big enterprises. In spite of having product
potential their business was not sustainable. Adhi said that it would be best
if they could first understand the market being probed. Although success was
not guaranteed at least there was preparation.
In terms of taxation, the government must give exceptional treatment for
micro business in imposing income tax for companies with return below Rp4.8
billion. Years which was 1%. He stated that those classified as the micro
business was the business sector with capital amounting to Rp0- Rp50 million
excusive of land and business site with maximum return of Rp0 – Rp300 million
year. However if the government were serious about implementing the policy, the
government should give feedback to UKM for the obligations. The government must
be able to protect UKM in business competition, help them to minimize
production cost and abolish illegal collections.(SS)
Business News - May 03,2013
No comments:
Post a Comment