The year 2013 had only gone half way. Nearly all assumptions and
macro-indicators targeted, such as economic growth, inflation rate, and Rupiah
value were all mispredicted. Annual inflation [y.o.y] was around 5.8% or higher
than the targeted 4.9% until finally the Government recised the target to 7.2%
in response to increased fuel price.
Rupiah exchange rate which was set at Rp9, 300 per USD was not realized
since Rupiah actual value against USD over the first semester of this year was
around Rp9, 750 per USD, Rupiah even sank deeper over the psychological level
of Rp10, 000 per USD. The same was with economic attainment, which was 6.2% was
still below the targeted 6.3%.
To meet target as set for 2013, hard work was inevitable for the
Government, and aggressive, tactical maneuvers called for. There were open
holes to be filled whereby assumptions could be met ot better still be
surpassed. The afore mentioned macro indicators were not easy targets, moreover
after the Government increase price of subsidized oil.
To jack up economic growth toward 6.3% was not an easy task. Export
could not be relied on as world demand declined with economic slowdown in
Europe and the USA and even China. At the first signal of economic betterment,
the government was expected to be responsible to make aggressive moves in
export to main trading counterparts like the USA, Japan, China and Singapore.
Budget utilization by the [provincial] Government remained to be low,
which made the driving force to economic growth to lose steam. Growth projection
for quarter two was even only 5.8%- 6.0% or lower than the budget realization
which was 6.02%.
Commitment of the Finance Ministry to ease budget liquidation, without
disregarding the rules of good Governance, was expected to accelerate economic
growth of quarter three and four.
Direct investment, whether domestic [PMDN] or foreign [PMA] was expected
to be maintained, at least the same level as 2012 at around Rp300 trillion.
Investment target this year was set at around Rp300 trillion. Even if the
target was not entirely met due to diminished foreign investment in Indonesia
it could come to Rp325- Rp350 trillion. Understandable because direct
investment since quarter 3 of last year was already signaling downturn.
Lastly, inflation. This was not less problematic. Many analyst and
economic inflation rate after the fuel price increase would be around 7.5% -
8.4%. Meanwhile the Government and House had agreed on inflation assumption at
7.2%. In this case BI had moved faster by increasing fasbi rate by 25 basic
point from 5.75% to 6% last June.
Most probably BI would again increase Fasbi rate and BI rate. This was
only only on the monetary side. What side being awaited for was Government
strategy in fiscal terms.
Not less important was to make sure that distribution of goods to run
smoothly to suppress extra cost creating inflator effect. Demand must be well
balanced with supply. Past experience at early this year showed weaknesses on
the supply side or demand side where supply of goods, including essential need
was insufficient.
The result was that price of goods like garlic, soy, rice, and white
sugar were elevated before the Government even increased price of subsidized
oil; including also horticulture products like fruits. While maintaining smooth
distribution traffic, it would be worthwhile for the government to make sudden,
unannounced inspection to traditional marketplaces to make sure there was no
price increase on the loose. In case of goods scarcity, the government through
Perum Bulog must swiftly stabilize price through timely extra supply and at
right amount.
Thereby it was expected that the macro economy target of this year could
be met. Perhaps the same could be expected in 2014. As known the Ministry of
Finance Chatib Basri projected national economic growth in 2014 to be around
6.4% - 6.5%. This was disclosed in technical meeting with Commission XI of
House in Jakarta last week [24/6].
The meeting dissected the basic policy for fiscal policy fos the APBN
State Budget 2014. The government in the outline fiscal policy for RAPBN budget
2013 projected economic growth 2014 at around 6.4% - 6.9%. However in view of
the latest economic climate, growth percentage was more probable to be at lower
level. To be exact, the modest projection of 6.4% - 6.5% was more probable that
higher level percentage.
What was meant by dynamic trend was tightened global financial
liquidity. Such would have its impact on Indonesia’s economy such as mounting
pressured on Rupiah. The propeller force of economic growth 2014 was still
dominated by household consumption, which was among others due to activities
related to the General Election of 2014.
In addition to that there were some programs aimed at increasing
people’s purchasing power. For example the Hopeful Family Program, Rice for the
Poor and increased pension plan for civil servants, the army, and police
personnel. This would among others be driven by incentives like reduced income
tax in some regions and incentives for the mining sector in the upstream
industry.
BI was not less confident than the Government that economic growth of
2014 would be better compared to 2013. Hence BI projected economic development
for 2014 at around 6.4%-6.8%. BI saw that economic growth was still much
supported bu household consumption while there was also improvement in internal
and external economic performance. Improvement of the world’s economy would be
followed by increased commodity price. This would improve performance of
Indonesia’s export which in the end would be one of the key contributors to
national economic growth.
Finally the Government and Commission XI of House agreed to make
assumptions of economic growth of 2014 at around 6.4%-6.9%: inflation 3.5% -
5.5% Rupiah exchange rate value Rp9, 600 – Rp9, 800 per USD. While assumption
of world’s oil price and production of ready-for-sale oil-and gas would be
dissected in Commission VII of House.
The assumed economic growth of Rp6.4% - Rp6.9% as agreed was
understandable as it was quite reasonable and natural. If realization of
economic growth this year was around 6.1% - 6.3%, it seemed reasonable that
next year higher growth was predictable, at least with the USA, Japan, and
China, moreover if all the propeller forces of economic growth [household
consumption, direct investment, Government expenditure and export-import] were
more dynamic compared to last year. Activities related the General Election
would also contribute around 0.2% - 0.4% to economic growth.
One notable point was inflation which was projected at 3.5% + 1%. If
inflation this year was only 7.5% as moderate assumption, meaning the
Government must work hard to lower inflation next year. This was not an easy
task, but not impossible, provided that the government strive for it seriously
amidst election preparation. Assumption for Rupiah was quite reasonable because
if realization of exchange rate this year was around Rp9, 750 per USD, next
year it could be around Rp9, 600 – Rp9, 800 per USD.
Furthermore assumption of SBN interest of 3 months of 4.5% - 5.5% was
rated as natural because inflation projection was only 3.5% - 5.5%. This
assumption would also give a picture that the Fasbi and BI rate would gradually
descend toward 3.5% - 4.0% and Fasbi interest 5.5% - 6.0% for BI rate. Broadly
speaking it might be concluded that macro economic assumptions stipulated for
next year was realistic enough to bring better optimism. (SS)
Business News - July 03,2013
No comments:
Post a Comment