By KUSNANDAR & CO., Attorneys at Law – Jakarta, INDONESIA
Cross-border
mergers and acquisitions have increasingly become a part of the global economic
landscape. Multinational corporations are actively acquiring local entities
across various countries, including Indonesia, in pursuit of market expansion,
strategic resource access, and technology consolidation. While these
transactions offer opportunities for increased investment and industrial efficiency,
they also raise serious legal and policy challenges related to national
interest protection, regulatory oversight, and economic sovereignty.
Legally, Indonesia
has several regulations governing merger and acquisition activities, both from
a corporate governance and competition law perspective. Law No. 40 of 2007 on
Limited Liability Companies provides the fundamental legal framework for
mergers, consolidations, and acquisitions. Meanwhile, competition aspects are
governed under Law No. 5 of 1999, further detailed in the Business Competition
Supervisory Commission (KPPU) Regulation No. 3 of 2023, which outlines criteria
and procedures for assessing mergers and acquisitions. In practice, any
corporate action that significantly affects market structure must be notified
to KPPU if it meets certain asset or sales thresholds. This notification
obligation also applies to cross-border transactions that have a domestic
market impact.
However, current
regulations still leave room for improvement. One key concern is the absence of
a formal legal mechanism to assess national interest in merger transactions. As
foreign entities increasingly acquire Indonesian companies, the government
should not merely focus on formal compliance or competition effects, but also on
strategic considerations such as control over vital assets, public service
relevance, and the long-term impact on domestic players. Countries like
Australia, Canada, and the United States have already implemented foreign
investment screening mechanisms to ensure that foreign investments do not
jeopardize public interest or national security. Indonesia should begin moving
in this direction.
Regulatory
fragmentation across sectors also presents a considerable challenge.
Cross-border mergers involving strategic sectors such as banking, energy,
telecommunications, or mining require additional approvals from sectoral
regulators, including the Financial Services Authority (OJK) and relevant
ministries. Coordination among these institutions is essential. Conflicting
regulations, overlapping procedures, and prolonged approval timelines can
create legal uncertainty for investors. While Indonesia has introduced the
Online Single Submission (OSS) system to simplify processes, its effective
implementation—particularly in cross-border contexts—still requires
strengthening.
Another emerging
issue in cross-border M&A is data privacy and confidentiality. In the
acquisition of digital, technology, or data-intensive companies, legal
considerations now go beyond corporate ownership and extend into data
governance. Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection imposes obligations
on data controllers to ensure that any cross-border data transfer or processing
adheres to principles of transparency, fairness, and maximum protection of
individual rights. Therefore, mergers are not merely about business
integration, but also involve the legal transfer of accountability over data
previously held by the acquired entity.
The role of KPPU as
the competition authority is critical in maintaining a fair post-merger market
structure. Cross-border mergers by dominant global players can lead to
oligopolistic markets, reducing the space for local competitors. KPPU should be
empowered not only to conduct post-transaction reviews but also to conduct
pre-transaction assessments, as is common practice in many jurisdictions. This
proactive approach would help prevent anti-competitive consequences from the
outset and provide legal certainty for all stakeholders.
From a broader
policy perspective, cross-border mergers and acquisitions should not be viewed
merely as corporate matters, but as a component of national strategy in
safeguarding economic sovereignty. The state must play a balancing
role—welcoming foreign investment while ensuring that such transactions yield
long-term benefits for national development, domestic industrial growth, and
meaningful knowledge transfer.
With stronger legal
governance and more cohesive institutional coordination, Indonesia can manage
cross-border M&A more wisely. Legal certainty, coupled with the protection
of national interests, must serve as the foundation to ensure that global
corporate transactions do not erode our economic autonomy, but instead
contribute to strengthening Indonesia’s position in the global economy.
K&Co - September 26, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment