Implementation of Good
Governance in Indonesia needed acceleration because data of good Governance
Indicator of the World Bank showed that Good Governance index in Indonesia was
still low, today at 37th position of maximum 100. Meanwhile
International Transparence Data [TI] based on the assessment source showed that
Corruption Perception Index [IPK] Indonesia 20-13 was at 114th
position among 177 countries.
Under the circumstances it came as no surprise that
financial institutions in Indonesia were places where fraid was happening as
disclosed by he Global Fund Survey 2014. “Therefore the awareness to implement
Good Governance effectively in the financially service and constantly and the
initiative must show sound benefit, instead of mere rules and regulations.”
Furthermore Mulliaman stated that the development of
institutional capital, which was in principle a form of good governance in
Indonesia must be constantly improved and perfectionized.
Good Governance, Muliaman said, was a necessity not just
a concept. Good Governance as a concept had been widely known and discussed by
professional circles but the implementation and benefit was still way below
people’s expectation. There was significant gap between the application of Good
Governance and public expectation of the benefits. Therefore there must be
sound initiative between to bring the concept down-to-earth so it could be well
understood, implemented, and be felt it its benefits.
In this case OJK was determined to be role model of Good
Governance implementation in Indonesia, especially in the financial service
industry. The strategic steps taken were among others:
- To interpreted and implement the principles of Good Governance as message of the OJK Law into all organization policy.
- To apply organizational policy which had check and balances.
- To set up which functionally run Good Governance, Risk Management, Quality Assurance and compliance of Good Governance through signing of the Integrity Pact.
- To set up employees’ Code Ethic and discipline to make sure that all activities were withinthe corridors of Good Governance through signing of the Integrity Pact.
- To make it mandatory for all officials to report their asset through LKHPN to KPK.
- Strengthening of control mechanism of the Board of Audit and to ensure functioning of Ethics Committee as message of the OJK Law.
- To set of standers operating procedures (SOPs) are developed based on the principles of governance as a reference for the mechanism of action at the OJK.
- To stipulate policy and the mechanism of whistle blowing system [WBS] for early warning channels, to underscore the right and responsibility of all staff to be clean and work professionally involving public participation and to create preventive effect.
- To apply the mechanism of rule making rule for regulating process involving the public and be transparent.
- To execute educational strategy and consumer’s protection among others through educational program, and to build consumers service centers for complaints. To realize good governance in the industry through strategic regulating, controlling, education and partnership with stakeholders.
In building a healthy and stable industry, OJK ran
management strategy, control and consumer’s education but also applied
partnership strategy with professionals and other stakeholders. OJK kept
communicating intensively qit association and professionals in the government
good government in the financial industry.
Today OJK together with associations were scheming Model
of Governance and combined Assurance OJK. The objective was to use the model as
reference for future applications. the same was with Model combined Assurance
as reference in developing assurance in internal OJK to make sure that good
government runs effectively.
The definition of Good Governance and combined assurance
of OJK which involved players of service industry and finance was one of OJK’s
strategy to promote governance quality in the financial service industry beside
the management and control approach. An approach as such was holistic approach
which emphasized more on need and benefit instead of the approach focusing on
suty and sanction. (SS)
Business News - November 21, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment