Admittedly, the impressive economic achievement of the past few years
was the fruits of hard work of the businesspeople. By their endeavors
investment and domestic consumption were still energetic and zealous to support
economic development.
A magnetic Indonesia market not only attracted local investors but also
foreign investors. At least there were three Asian states which aggressively invest
their capital in Indonesia, i.e. Chinese, Japan and South Korea. They saw
Indonesia’s big market as the main magnet.
In view of the massive investment made by national and foreign
investors, the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce recommended the Government to
immediately issue Government’s Regulation as substitute to Law [Perpu] or
issues new law soonest.
The objective was that businesspeople had sound legal assurance. KADIN
saw that Indonesia’s political atmosphere was no guarantee to private
investment. The investment made by the private sector was high and needed a
long time for return on investment so sound and firm legal protection was
indispensable.
There were five PERPU or laws which were expected to be put in effect.
Firstly, on marine based connectivity program which would connect one island
with another to enhance economic efficiency.
Secondly, the development of primary mining industry [copper, aluminum,
nickel, and iron, tin, gold] and petro-chemical industry needed to be spurred
on in their development. Because national downstream industry was not healthy,
they were highly reliant on imported raw material.
Thirdly, investment in mining/petrochemicals which were already underway
must be protected and be given the opportunity to increase production. They
should even be given the incentive to collaborate with the private sector and
regional business circle. Investors believed that with strong legal protection,
investment would increase in the regions especially outside Java, in the least
developed province which were the center of natural resources it would be
necessary to set up joint marketing bodies for mining commodities.
Fourthly, matters related to the development of acceleration of trade in
the border zones. The objective was to prevent economic disparity of the
regions so it was necessary to authorize the regions to make regulations for
boundary zones. The way it had been ministrial bureaucracy was very
complicated. By authority of the The Board of National Boundary Management
[BPNP] economic growth in the bioder zones could be accelerated.
Fifthly, BULOG needed to be given strong legal authority to manage
distribution of rice, corn, soy, garlics, beef, etc. As there was no balance
between supply and demand those commodities tend to create annual problem in
turn, so BULOG’s interference might come in handy. However BULOG needed to be
given strong legal authority.
The above mentioned five demands deserved positive response from the
Government. As businessmen’s partner. It was only very natural for the
Government to try to meet the businesspeople’s demand.
Apart from the above five aspirations of businesspeople, in fact the
most fundamental thing to be established by the Government was law and order
and political stability. As know, lately arms continued to happen. Meanwhile
political tension also heightened toward Presidential and legislative election
next year.
Another example was the riot in Palopo, South Sulawesi. A mob in this
town ran amock and burned some buildings. The trigger was outcome of direct
election of local Governor. The lost party claimed they were being cheated and
took to anarchy.
Another case was a group of masked and armed men attacking a jailhouse
in Cebongan Sleman killing four detainees who previously killed a soldier. The
scene of attack by a gang of masked men was like an action movie and was talk
of town. Many people condemned the attack but there were also those who
supported because the shot detained were reckoned to be crooks.
It awakened Man’s conscience that all the violence in the past one month
shook the sense of security among the public. The law was regarded as
non-existent and powerless against disorder that threatened the public. The act
of a group of masked people who cruelly executed four detainees at the Cebongan
Jailhouse, Sleman, Yogyakarta was one of the expression of distrust in law or
law enforcers.
The act of taking the law in one’s own hands was becoming a trend in all
levels of society; the law in this country had lost its power and dignity.
Before the unrest, this country was also rocked by the case of leaking
of the letter of command to investigate [spridik] of the Hambalang corruption
case. One of the Commission Chairman of the Antigraft Board [KPK] was reported
as being involved in the leaking which mentioned Anas Urbaningrum as suspect.
Uproar in internal KPK bursted out. Finally the Committee of Ethics stated
there were two persons among KPK Board of Leaders who were declared as quilty
and were sanctioned by way of reprimanding verbally as well as in writing to
said persons.
On the political side, other cases which were public spotlight were
President SBY who was elected as Chairman of the Democrat Party [PD] by
unanimous decision at the party’s extraordinary congress. SBY was elected as
Chairman flanked by two active ministers to act as Daily Executive. SBY’s son
Edhie Baskoro Yudhoyono [Ibas] was entrusted as Secretary General.
SBY was accused as trying to build political dynasty. Double role which
was once criticized by SBY was now exercised by himself. Criticism bursted out
again because leaders of this country were accused as not being exemplary in
managing in the nation. The cases stormed alternately covering up previous
scandalous cases like the Bank Century and Hambalang which were virus on the
nation.
All the occurrences seemed to wipe out all the future plans of the
nation to progress ahead. All the problems of the nation seemed to be ignored
and neglected by the cases.
Public perceptions seemed reasonable because the nation tend to easily
forget a case when then another case emerged to overshadow it. The public tend
to easily forget big tragic cases when they were presented with other cases
which were probably fabricated or blow up. Under such circumstances the
guilties would clap their hands and celebrate.
This year 2013 and 2014 are political years, a year full of political
interest rather than national interest. The people were called for to be more
cautious in responding to any occurrence that happened. The public must be on
the alert, not to be trapped in any group’s ambitious moves but stick to
efforts of serving the nation instead.
In the domain of law, the judge’s verdicts which were often against the
public’s sense of justice influenced greatly to the dignity of law enforcers.
The cases of judges, investigators and law enforcers who were caught red handed
receiving bribery were probably only the top of iceberg.
Cynism was inevitable among the public, who believed that the judges
being arrested for receiving bribery were just having their bad day. Bribery
practices for winning any case was nothing new in the process of law
enforcement. Whoever possessed power and money, they could control the law. At
least that was the public perception. The law was only sharp downward [the
marginal’s and poor people] but blunt upward [the authorities and capitalism].
The public, who time after time were entertained with a play of law
enforcement which was full of falsehood, took their own conclusion that they no
longer trust law enforcement process in this country. People’s violence against
criminals or suspected criminal was a way of reaching to justice,.
Even in the Regency of Simalungun, North Sumatra, a police officer, when
he raided illegal gambling, died tragically after being attacked by a mob who
shouted “Thieve!” at him. This hurts people’s sense of justice and was most
painful. However, there was no short of empathy from the Government’s side and
the occurrence was regarded as commonplace.
All news reporting on economy, security, politics and law were easily
accessible by foreign investors abroad. When they realized how turbulent the occurrences
were, it was not impossible that the investors changed their minds about
investing in Indonesia.
Foreign investors who invested their capital since a long time ago might
walk out and go to another country. The disheartening fact was that even local
investors might be reluctant to expand their business in Indonesia and start to
look for another location in another country where life was safer, more
peaceful and more prospective. So advise for the Government was listen to the
voice of business people and respond to them with sound action instead of just
to retort.(SS)
Business News - April 10,2013
No comments:
Post a Comment