On a quiet and peaceful day, all of a sudden the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) made a shocking announcement of a potential
overheating of economy in the Asia states were asked to neutralize their macro
economy policy to anticipate any possible overheating.
IMF stated that on the short term there were anxiety of
overheating pressures bursting out in Asia. IMF saw that in some countries
there were some strains of downturning inflation although in some countries
inflation was partially descending as indicated by prices of commodities
moderately moving.
Specifically IMF saw signs of core inflation which was
still high in some countries, even indlation projection in many countries had
exceeded mid-year target which was set by the respective countries.
Such was on account of macro economy polices which was
accommodative where bank interest rate in some Asian countries were
surprisingly below that of pre-crisis era in 2002-2007. For that matter
countries of the Asian region must adopt more neutralized macro economic
policy.
Governments of Asian states must set eyes on domestic
demand and rely less on export to jack up on that Asian states must take the
great challenge of changing the model of economic character.
The change in growth characteristics would help to step
up public participation and minimize inequality which had been prominent in the
past decade. Meanwhile it would be necessary to keep watch on the risk of
bubble economy in property business in Asia, especially China and Singapore
which had somehow cooled down by Government’s intervention who actively strived
to ease property prices time after time.
To take a closer look at China, property prices were
reduced and transactions lessened. The risk of bubble in property prices in
China had been significantly under control. As known, China had taken some
administrative measures to make sure that the bubbles were not dangerous.
In fact to quote the official statements of the
authorities in China and India, who lowered their projection of economic growth
to 7.5% and 6.8% respectively, IMF statement was irrelevant and was even
controversial.
Moreover the Asia development Bank (ADB) also reported
that economic recovery in Europe which was full of uncertainty could have its
effect on global economy. Asia was no exception, including Indonesia.
ADB report under the title of “Asian Development Outlook
2012” showed the average economic growth in Asia would still increase and even
to soar up by 2013. The propeller was strong domestic consumption. In that case
IMF estimate was not applicable this year, perhaps next year.
ADB saw that continuous uncertainty in Europe and
slowdown of global trading had posed as the biggest threat to the future growth
of Asia. ADB estimated that economic growth as indicated by GDP in Asia would
come to 6.9% - the figure was predicted to kove up again to 78.3% in 2013.
ADB report mentioned four regions in Asia and East Asia
would lead economic growth in 2012. The growth projection was 7.4% which was a
downturn against the 8.1% in 2011.
In spite of highest growth rate, the economic growth rate
in this region was declining due to slowing down export. China would still be
the locomotive of growth in the East Asia region. The economic growth in this
bamboo curtain country tend to be moderate, growing from 7.5% in 2012 to become
8.5% in 2013. But this growth projection was posted at 9.2%.
In the second position was South Asia which would score
growth of 6.6% in 2012. Economic growth in that region was influenced by Issued
demand and fiscal limitations. India would lead economic growth in this region
with growth rate of around 6.8% - 7.0%.
Meanwhile Central Asia was predicted to undergo change in
economic activities through 2012. ADB estimated economic growth in this region
to be merely 6.1% due to economic recovery in Europe and lessened economic
growth in Russia.
In the Southeast Asia region, economic growth was
projected at merely around 5.7% in 2012 against 4.6% in the previous year.
Although considerably lower compared to other Asian countries, Southeast Asian
states were fortunate to undergo economic growth compared to previous year.
How was Indonesia’s position? Amidst high economic growth
in Asia and global uncertainty, according to ADB, Indonesia was in a safe
position whereby to strongly grow. ADB predicted Indonesia’s economy would grow
by 6.4% in 2012 amidst lowered external demand. However, the situation would
revitalize itself in 2013 in line recovered trading and betterment of
investment climate.
Generally speaking Indonesia’s economy would be in the
process of sustainable growth for the long run moreover the Indonesian
Government had their commitment to increase public investment in infra
structure.
In addition to the above the Government of RI would also
minimize obstacles to development such as weakness in budget utilization and to
lessen imbalance of development between the western part and eastern part of
Indonesia.
Global economic weakening would force the Government to
speed up infra-structure development to jack up economic growth for the short
run. Besides, the Government planned to step up economic potential for the mid
term. Insufficient development of infrastructure especially in energy and
transportation sectors would be a hindrance to economic growth.
Generally speaking economic estimated Indonesia’s economy
which referred to GDP would grow moderately at 6.3% - 6.5% this year. This
prediction was relatively the same o lower than growth realization in 2011 at
6.5%. Sector wise, the manufacturing sector was estimated to be the propeller
of economy growth.
The international property consultant Knight Frank even
stated that in 2050 Indonesia would be in the fourth position in the world in
terms of GDP. By that time Indonesia’s GDP would reach USD 13.93 trillion.
Compared to developing countries in Asia, Indonesia’s GDP
percentage was predicted to increase from 27% in 2010 to 49% in 2050. The
supporting factors to GDP growth were among others Indonesia as producer of
products from rich natural resources.
Furthermore Indonesia would be in the 8th
position in the word in terms of economic growth, i.e. 68% in 2050. The top
five position in the world were occupied by Nigeria (8.5%), India (8%), Iraq
(7.7%), Bangla Desh (7.5%) and Vietnam (7.5%).
From the above picture it was apparent that IMF
projection about economic overheating was mere exaggeration. Moreover inflation
in Asia was under control by some fiscal and monetary policies which were
effective to ease inflation pressures.
Business
News - May 11, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment