Halal Certification in Indonesia was
way below the level of Muslim populated Southeast Asian countries. Data of
National Boar of Standardization [BSN] had it that halal certification in
Indonesia was let than 20% while in Malaysia
it was above 90%. Head of BSN Bambang Prasetya stated in Jakarta on
Monday [10/3] that toward free market era, invasion of halal products from
abroad was heightening including from non-Muslim countries. Unfortunately so
far one of Indonesia’s fortress of certification was still vulnerable.
Bambang rated that to enhance halal
certification to play catch up with other countries, the body which issued
certificate must be part of the Government, not Non Governmental Organization
[NGO] of limited budget. The discussion over the Bill of Halal Products
Assurance [JPH] had bin hanging on for 9 years due to disagreement between the
ministry of religious Affairs and the Indonesia Council of Ulama [MUI]. And
yet, Bambang said, that finalization of Halal certification was a pressing
necessity toward ASEAN free market era.
Bambang stated that low halal
certification figures in Indonesia was triggered by minimum consumer’s
awareness of the importance of accountable halal lable. Halal certification, he
said, was more than just formality but it consistently informed the consumers
that the product was Halal. He disclosed that quite frequently Indonesian food
products were rejected in Muslim countries due to doubted halal certificate.
Businesspeople demanded that the existing accredited Halal Certification Body
released products which were Halal and competitive abroad.
He disclosed that in Indonesia, Halal
certification was issued by MUI since 2005 to end of 2011. The Board of Food,
Medicine and Cosmetics certifies with products totaling 97,794 items from 3,561
companies. The figure was claimed to increase when combined with Halal
certificates issued by LP-POM-MUI of the regions spread out in 33 provinces.
In the past 5 years LLPOM-MUI had
issued 13,136 Halal certificates of total products circulated istered 175.157
products of which around 103,382 products or around 59.01% had pockted MUI’s
Halal Certificate.
Meanwhile the F&B industry circles
demanded that evaluation of Halal products must refer to Mutal Recognized
Agreement [MRA]. The reason was that each country had different criteria of the
Halalness of a products. Secretary General of GAPPMI Franky Sibarani said that
the definition of Halal might be different with each country.
Franky said that since the very
beginning he proposed halal labeling not to be compulsory but poluntary. Although
voluntary, it did not mean that the F&B products without halal label were
presumably un Halal. He feared that compulsory but voluntary. Although
voluntary, it did not mean that the F&B products of the small industry.
Franky rated that labeling of Halal
Certificate for F&B products made local F&B products lose compepetion
against imported products. Moreover toward AEC 2015, Halal labeling on products
would be subject of long debates among international F&B producers.
GAPPMI rated that halal labeling of products in company
could not be forced. The bill for Halal Guarantee of Products [JPH] was never
passed so far. The reason was tug-of-war still going on between Government and
House. Parliament demanded authority to be given to MUI, while the Government
because MUI was not part of the Government. He stated that F&B producers
under GAPPMI had mostly applied for Halal certificate. From the Marketing
viewpoint labeling of Halal would be well accepted by the Indonesian people who
were mostly Muslims. (SS)
Business New - March 14, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment