The Consumer Dispute
Settlement Body [BPSK] of the Jakarta Municipality saw many members of The
Association of Indonesian Financing Companies [APPI did not respond to the call
of Court. BPSK had even sent 3 letters of call to financing corniness. The
call was pursuant to consumers' complaint. Normally calls were related to
cases of nonperforming loan, confiscation, loss of motor vehicles etc.
"We are glad that APPI had the courage to make such a statement in a press
conference and in one seminar [27/3] at Hotel Le Meridien Jakarta. We feel it
necessary to strip off APPI so the public will know who breaks the Law"
Yohannes Tobing, member of BPSK Jakarta told Business News 128/3].
BPSK Jakarta was located at
Jalan Satrio no 7 Kuningan South Jakarta. BPSK had received many complaints
about indisclipinary acts of its members. BPSK just according to the rules of
dispute handling, took actions in three stages, i.e. conciliation, mediation
and arbitration. The three stages could run well if the consumer and
businesspeople were present to comply to BPSK's call. "The leasing company
always refused to come. We had asked for investigator's help, in this case the
Directorate of Consumer's Protection, Ministry of Trade. We were shocked,
because suddenly APPI accused BPSK as personal. This is indeed
contradictory."
APPI admitted that many Non
Governmental Organization [LSM] members individually broke the Law. BPSK as
Consumers Legal Protector was located in every Level II Regencies and Cities
in all of Indonesia, were under Law no.8 / 1999 on Consumer's Protection. The
institution was in charge of setting consumers' disputes outside the General
Court. But there was a BPSK in Tasikmalaya West Java who acted as if trying to
protect the consumer but had the hidden intention of not paying credit installment money. There was even a collector of a financing agency being
tortured.
Since the very beginning
the BPSK individual offered " security services" to consumers. Somewhere
along the way the consumer was advised not to continue paying his automotive
credit. When the collector was tortured, the company made a report to the
Police, but some Policemen of Tasikmalaya were members of the BPSK gang. The
report proceeded to Mayor's level with zero result. "The Mayor of Tasikmalaya
branded us as capitalist. We were told to go away from Tasikmalaya. The
occurrence was published in the press it happened 2 years ago" Chairman
of APPI Suwandi Wiratno disclosed to Business News [28/31].
APPI suspected BPSK
individuals who protected fraudulent consumers was not only in Tasikmalaya
but they were spread out in many regions. Time after time after legal actions
were taken appeared another BPSK person in another place. "Criminal
disturbances always happened, in any region at all, but the frequency was not
increasing, around 1.6% only" Suwandi remarked.
Occurrence in Tasikmalaya
was lesson to learn for law enforcers and related institutions especially the
Ministry of Trade, because BPSK as instrument of the Law was under the
Ministry of Trade. "We know that BPSK is under the Ministry of Trade; but
the way I see it, BPSK persons in the regions are unknown or not registered at
the Ministry of Trade, but they act as if they had mastery over problems. They
hide behind the masquerade of protecting consumers.”
APPI stated they would
never compromise with BPSK persons. So if there was any dispute brought to
court, APPI members always emerge as winners. BPSK also Lawyers among their
list of members. But when the Lawyer seemed to protect wrong consumers APPI
would still not accept. “At the Court we normally win”.
On the other hand the
Association of Indonesian Financing Agencies [APPI] admitted that some of their
members broke the Law like making double charges etc on consumers, but that did
not represent APPI as a whole. “We are talking about individuals nor company
who is working professionally.”
APPI claimed that they were
controlling their members. If there was anyone breaking the rule, APPI would
take firm action. There was even an APPI official who sent one of his employees
to jail. The action was as punishment to indisclipinary act, fleeing with
consumers money for motorcycle credit installment. “There are consumers who
paid, but he as collector ran away with the money. The consumer produced
receipt and reported to the company. We put sanction on indisclipinary employees.
“Some companies acted firmly, they sent their employees to jail. (SS).
Business New - April 2, 2014
1 comment:
I am really appreciating very much by seeing your interesting posts.
queens dwi lawyer
Post a Comment