Thursday, 17 October 2013

ADDITION OF TAX OFFICIALS WILL INCREASE TAX REVENUES



Increasing the number of tax officials, while maintaining work productivity, is expected to increase tax revenues. This is the statement of Head of External Relations at the Directorate General of Taxation, Chandra Budi, delivered via a press release in Jakarta (Tuesday, September 3), as a response to the many Questions about the effectiveness of the pla to increase the number of tax officials on the increase of tax of tax revenues.

The proposal on addition of employees, especially for the position of Tax Audit and Account Representative at the Directorate General of Taxation has been through a comprehensive analysis and benchmarking. The result comparative analysis between the number of tax officials and the total population in a country shows that the Directorate General of Taxation is still likely to increase the number of employees to be at least close to the comparison ratio in other countries.

In the last four years, the analysis shows a positive correlation between employee productivity, which is reflected in the amount of budget that is used, and the tax revenue realization. In 2009, every Rp 1 billion budget spent would generate tax revenue of Rp 102.7 billion. Then in 2010, every Rp 1 billion budget contributed to Rp 123.1 billion tax revenues. This figure in creasing every year, and in 2012, From Rp 1 billion budget that is used, Rp 163 billion tax revenue is generated.

There was also an increase in employee productivity quite significantly to the realization of tax revenue. In 2009, each employee of the Directorate General of Taxation averagely contributed Rp 17.1 billion to tax revenue realization. This value increased in 2011, where every employee contributed at least Rp 23.4 billion. In 2012, employee contribution is increasing, i.e. every employee of the Directorate General of Taxation contributed Rp 26.6 billion to the realization of tax revenue. 

Business News - September 6, 2013

ENTEREORENEURS ASKED THE GOVERNMENT TO OVERCOME ILLEGAL IMPORTS



Indonesia is an attractive market for a number of imported products, including plastic products. With a population of over 230 million people, Indonesia is a very huge market. It is reasonable if Indonesia became one of the countries targeted by illegal stuff. Weak monitoring and legal enforcement by the related apparatuses causes such practice to take place continuously. If the authorities are willing to act firmly, it is very easy to track it. “Illegal imports are very disturbing, and we ask the government to help us solve this”, said Fajar Budiyono, Secretary General of the Indonesia Olefin, Aromatic, and Plastic Industry Association (Inaplas) in Jakarta (Monday, September 2).

The plastic industry has asked the government to verity the import of finished plastic products that enter Indonesia. Fajar said that the import of finished plastic products into Indonesia this year is estimated at USD 1.6 billion, increased 33% compared to the previous period at USD 1.2 billion. According to him, this estimate is about the legally imported plastics. In fact, the illegally imported plastics circulating in the market today are a lot more.

He said that Indonesia already has a safety instrument to withstand the circulation of illegal imports, ranging from non-tariff barriers, anti-dumping standards, as well as government-borne import duty (BMDTP) facility. Therefore, his party has asked the government, in this case the technical ministries, both the Ministry of Industry and the Ministry of Trade, to verity the import of finished plastic products. What is meant by import verification is that the government verifies the volume, type, and country of origin of the plastic products. The reason is that there have been many products that are imported via Malaysia or ASEAN, although they are coming from other countries, just to get a 0% tax.

In addition, his party asked the government to be serious in realizing BMDTP each year. For this year, the realization of BMDTP can be felt in September. In fact, BMDTP is much needed by the industry considering that 40%-50% of the raw materials have to be imported because of the very limited capability of local producers.

Meanwhile, the Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS) recorded that the importation of plastics and plastic goods for January to April 2013 rose 11.7% year-on-year to USD 2.48 billion. While, imports in the previous period in 2012 were at USD 2.22 billion. Plastic imports in April 2013 amounted to USD 688.9 million, up 9% from March 2013 which stood at USD 631.6 million. He explained that the increase in imports of plastics is the impact of the continuation of the slowing of the domestic plastic industry since last year. As a result, supply of imported plastics is still large early this year.

He admitted that the national plastic industry last year was less enthusiastic. Because the demand of plastic products in international markets fell due to global crisis. He considered that the rampant imports of plastics products are quite reasonable. The reason is that consumption of plastics and plastic products in the domestic market is estimated to continue to grow around 8% this year. Inevitably, imported plastic products also increase the penetration into the local market. However, he remains optimistic about the plastic business in the country. Domestic plastic business can improve in the middle of this year. Because there is good news from the petrochemical industry, especially the upstream sector. Price of naphtha, one of the main raw materials of upstream petrochemical industry, started to decline.

Business News - September 6, 2013

JSMR THE PIONEER OF TOLL ROAD BUSINESS



The exploding number of motor vehicles had created high demand for more roads in Indonesia. This means an opportunity to PT Jasa Marga Tbk [JSMR] as toll road builder to step up their performance. JSMR had been striving hard to increase their market share to hold the position as market leader in toll road business.

Today Jasa Marga commanded over 545 km of toll roads while company’s market share had come to 73%. Embarking on Semester II of 2013, building of nine toll road sections had been completed which means increased contribution of 40% or 215 km of roads of the total length of toll roads in Indonesia.

In case of toll road in Bali which was expected to be inaugurated by President SBY this September 2013, would be followed by Semarang-Bawean toll road in October 2013, and JORR W-2 in quarter I-2014; furthermore Gempol-Pasuruan in quarter III-2013, the rest would be Cengkareng-Kunciran, Kunciran-Serpong, and Surabaya-Modjokerto in 2015.

The connecting toll road would be Kebon-Jeruk-Cileduk Raya section. Of the projects underway, Jasa Marga disclosed there were three sections of additional toll roads; a crucial project because of the three projects: the Kebon Jeruk-Meruya section was still hindrance as land clearing was still not accomplished.

This was disclosed by President Director of Jasa Marga Adityawarman in Jakarta yesterday [2/9]. He said that to build 9 new toll roads section called for extremely high expense needed by company’e equity and consortium, the total need amounting to Rp 25 trillion.

The toll road construction underway were multi-year projects. This means that the fund for the projects underway was accumulated fund from the company’s pas equity. “Toll road building is not a one single year project, it is multi-years project because budget of the previous year is also used for this year. But we confirm that syndication of banks for the projects underway is already there” Adityawarman was quoted as saying.

About the toll road projects in Bali, particularly the Benoa-Ngurah rai-Nusa  Dua was the first toll road built on sea surface in Indonesia after the Suramadu toll bridge connecting Java and Madura being operated in June 2009 last. This new toll road built in early 2012 stretched over the Benoa gulf would be Bali’s new icon.

To Increase Toll Road Tariff

In this near future toward September 2013, JMSR planned to increase toll tariff by 10% or return investment. Previously Adityawarman once stated to increase toll tariff by 10%; the tariff increase applied to all sections expect Cikampek and Sudiatmo.

Some of Jasa Marga toll roads to have tariff increase, according to Adityawarman were the sections of: Jakarta-Bogor-Ciawi, Jakarta-Tangerang, Jakarta Inner Toll Roads, Belawan-Medan-Tanjung Morawa, Palimanan-Kanci, Semarang Toll, Surabaya Gempol, Purwakarta-Bandung Cileunyi, and Jakarta Outer Ring Road [JORR]. The tariff increase as an option for return investment to cover toll building expenses. To support economic growth, infra structures like toll roads was needed.

Adityawarman said the plan to increase toll road tariff was not correlated with Minimum Service Standard [SPM] because whether toll tariff was increased or not SPM would still be fulfilled and improved. “Regularly every six months we are checking up all toll road sections” he said.

Adityawarman was expecting that all toll road users were using E toll card in paying instead of paying by cash. The number of E-toll card owners constituted only 9.14% of all toll road users. “our target is that 30% of toll road users would use that payment facility” he said.

The use of E-toll card could shorten the long queue line at toll gates; today the number of automatic Toll Gate had come to 50 while for E-toll pass there were 39 counters which were spread out I the sections of Cawang-Tomang-Cengkareng and JORR.

Meanwhile Jasa Marga Operation Director Hasannudin explained that increase of toll tariff would be effective by end of September, as stipulated by the Toll Road Management Board [BPJT], Ministry of Public Works. “We would strive hard to fulfill SPM as required” Hasan remarked

According to Hasan, although 14 sections of Jasa Marga toll road sections which were problematic. Some sections which were rated as not fulfilling SPM was the Jakarta Cikampek section where there were holes on the road surface.

Road maintance to meet SPM requirement according to Hasan would use financing from routine financing budget. the fund being prepared was Rp 350 billion. As with the percentage of toll tariff increase, so far the Ministry of Public Works was still waiting for inflation calculation by the Central Board of Statistics for the past 2 years. 

Meanwhile the toll road sections to have their tariff increased per September 2013 were as follow: Jakarta-Bogor-Ciawi, Jakarta-Tangerang, Jakarta Inner Toll Road, JORR, Padalarang-Cileunyi, Semarang Section A,B, and C, Surabaya-Gempol, Palimanan-Plumbon-Kanci, Cikampek Purwakarta-Padalarang, Belawan-Medan-Tanjung Morawa, Serpong-Pondok Aren-Ulijami, Ujung Pandang phase I and II.

Business News - September 6, 2013

TO IDENTIFY SIGNALS OF ECONOMIC CRISIS



Today some sort of polemic was going on whether Indonesia had entered the state of crisis or not. By theory monetary crisis was indicated by depreciation of Rupiah value against USD, negative Balance of Payment, letter of Credit of national banks not accepted by foreign banks and increasing amount of money in circulation.

In monetary crisis, normally accompanied by crisis in banking, marked by the following indicators: there were banks which failed, BI rate increasing within a short time, fixed deposit interest of banks also rising drastically, banks unable to fulfill obligations to creditors.

Accumulated monetary crisis and crisis in the banking sector boiled down in economic crisis, as signified by the following: credit interest rate extremely high in respond to increased SBI or BI rate, stagnation happening in the real sector, mass dismissals happening the real sector.

To refer to the above definitions as benchmark, it might be concluded that Indonesia as today no in the state of crisis. However high alert by the Government and all authorities and regulators were still necessary. In short, all parties must not be on the off-guard.

Signs of economic weakening was beginning to be felt in 2012 last when economic growth fell to the level of 6.23%, lower than that of the previous year at 6.5%. in the past 2 years, economic growth was still at above 6%, perhaps only outsmarted by China [8.5%] and India [7%].

World’s compliment was addressed to three countries which escaped crisis that smashed the world, namely China, India and Indonesia. The reason was that the three countries posted notably high growth percentage amidst the threat of world’s crisis in 2008. Investors from developing nations flew in to Indonesia as Indonesia was rated as the safest place to invest amidst grave economic condition in Europe and America.

Since 2008, national economic stability had been well secured, with national economic growth rate consistently managed at above 6%. At the Stock Hall, index of IHSG was once something to be proud of, touching the level of above 5,000.

Unfortunately, lately Indonesia’s fundamental economy had to face great challenges. The negative sentiment came from economic uncertainty of the world and monetary policy in the USA related to Quantitative Easing part III. At home, inflation soared up in line with oil price increase on June 2 last which jacked upon inflation of July by 3.29%, the highest since 2008. National economic growth rate was also corrected to below 6%, to be exact 5.8% in Semester I 2013.

Lately, IHSG index was shaken, nose diving way below its highest level, while foreign capital was on the walk out in large scale. Acts of selling spread out only to drop premium shares down. Rupiah was drawn downward. Rupiah value collapsed helplessly against strengthening USD.

Some circles were worries about the present national economic condition. Downfall of Rupiah value reminded people of the bad times of 1998. It was known as the darkest hour in the history of national economy. Many economic observers stated that crisis was always possible if the Government was not on the alert.

The Government was compact to cast aside the notion that the condition of today was the same as that of 1998. So far the condition of Indonesia’s fundamental economy today was by far better than 1998. Even to compare against 2008, what was happening today was safely under control.

Coordinating Minister Hatta Rajasa and the Financial Service Authority [OJK] were also compact in saying that the present condition was far from the danger of crisis. the same was disclosed by Finance Minister Chatib basri that compared to 1998, the condition then was by far more grave than the present condition. So the year 2013 was not comparable to 1998 or 2008.

The question lingered on, are we now on the brink of crisis as in 1998 and 2008? Some indicators could serve as reference to see the similarity of the present condition with that of 1998 or 2008.

Firstly, Rupiah exchange rate value weakened. In 1998 Rupiah was on a free fall to Rp 17,000 per USD. It was a steep downfall against the pre-crisis moment of 1997 when Rupiah exchange rate value was Rp 4,850 per USD. In mid September 2008, severe condition effect on Rupiah. Rupiah value noise-dived to Rp 11,711 per USD in November 2008 which was an extremely deep depreciation of Rupiah, because only a month before Rupiah was at Rp 10,048. Per USD.

In August 22, 2013 last Rupiah value slumped toRp 11,000.- per USD and was predicted to sink even deeper in line with the QE part three to be exercised by the US Central Bank. Rumors spread out that the QE 3 policy would be stopped by stages in line with bettered US economy.

Secondly, IHSG index sank quite deeply. On the brink of economic crisis of 1998, the stock market was shaken. IHSG fell to its lowest point: 292,12 point in 1998 against Semester I 1997. Dow fall of IHSG was also happening today. OJK noted that  in spite of falling, the slump was only around 4%-5%. According to OJK, if IHSG fell by 10% in 3 consecutive days, only then it could be defined as crisis.

On August 19, 2013 IHSG was closed to weaken by 255.14 points or 5.58% to the level of 4,313; while on August 20, IHSG was again closed to drop by 138.54 points to the level of 4,174 but on August 21 again IHSG moved up to 43.47 points or 1.04% to become 4,218. Lastly during transaction on August 22, IHSG again weakened 1.19% to the level of 4,168.

Thirdly Non Performing Loan was at large, soaring up sky high in the crisis of 1998. NPL was posted at 30%. Today in 2013, NPL was still below 5%. Banks were ask to refrain from jacking up credit amidst economic slowdown. If banks persisted to grow by jacking up credit, it might trigger another problem, i.e. NPL.

Fourthly, high inflation pressures during the crisis of 1998 was extremely high: inflation in 1998/1999 was posted at 45.9%, while inflation during crisis of 2008 came to 12.4% in September, being jacked up by increasing world’s oil price which led to Government’s policy to increase oil price.

The same condition was happening today in this year 2013: increased oil price triggered notably high inflation.

The Central Statistics Board [BPS] predicted inflation of 2013 to reach 3.29%. inflation through January-July soared above 6.75% with yearly inflation [July 2013 against July 2013] at 8.61%. Yearly inflation was posted as highest since 2009. As with monthly inflation, July was the highest since 1998. Inflation still continued in August at 1.12% resulting in calendar inflation at 7.94% [ytd] and annual inflation of 8.79% [y o y].

Fifthly banks were having liquidity problem. The banking sector was smashed by crisis in 1998. Consumer’s trust in banks declined. Liquidation of banks without considering customers’ panic was the beginning of unrest in the banking sector when crisis came.

Customers panic had drained bank’s financing resources. Banks liquidity dried up, forcing BI to inject liquidity facility. Today the condition was nit as bad as 1998. Bank’s liquidity was more influenced by BI’s policy to lower LDR from the previous 100% to 92%. This would force banks to maintain their liquidity with the consequences of fighting for people’s limited fund.

From the above picture it might be concluded that the condition of today was for from economic crisis. one of the indicators was that the business world was still operating, bank’s credit still extended, IHSG showing upturn, and Rupiah beginning to strengthen.

All were the direct impact of BI’s policy and the Government Four Policy Package. Apparently indicators of macro economy was getting better as the National Crisis Protocol was set ready to prepare for the worst.
 
Business News - September 6, 2013