Tuesday, 14 May 2013

FISCAL CLIFF STILL THE FOCUS OF ATTENTION



The Moneymarket

The issue of fiscal cliff in the USA was predicted still to be the focus of attention of the global moneymarket. Today Barrack Obama administration was challenged to revitalize the state budget whereby to safeguard continuity of US economic development.

The Fiscal Cliff solution would rely on two instruments. Firstly, the US Government would axe routine expenses especially for defense purposes. Secondly, in parallel with that the Obama Government would increase taxes on the rich group in the USA. Those were citizens with income above USD 250,000 per annum. Data had it that 2% of America’s population belonged to this wealthy group.

Assuming talks over the fiscal cliff ran smoothly which was due in early 2013, the prospect of economic recovery in the USA would be clear. The positive impact would spread out to all trading sectors in the USA. The financial sector would also be energized as market trust increased.

Demand for property and automotive in the USA would soar up. Unemployment figure would drop to the expected level, i.e. 7%. Manufacturing index would exceed the safe level of 50. In the end economic activity would be more dynamic.

America’s trading partner, especially Indonesia would share the cream of success where Rupiah value would arrive at a new equilibrium. Export demand from America would increase. Inflow of foreign capital would be heavier. There was ray of hope that world’s economic recovery would come sooner.

Rupiah exchange rate value against rate value against USD at the inter-bank spot market Jakarta last Wednesday (28/11) was closed to thin out by 5 points (0.051%) to the position of Rp 9,615/Rp 9,610.615. Weakening of Rupiah today was still determined by market’s fear over the condition in Europe. Soon as the euphoria about bailout for Greece was over, Greece had been confirmed about their getting bailout which was scheduled to liquidate on December 13, 2012. However the latest development in Germany signaled some obstacles as the German Parliament discussed the latest bailout scheme for Greece.

Therefore, over the sessions Rupiah reached its lower level of Rp 9,620 after momentary strengthening to Rp 9,595 against the opening level of Rp 9,600 per USD. There was report that the German Parliament would conduct voting for bailout for Greece on Friday last week but the last comment by one of Germany’s house members of the Steinbroejk opposition party was that the voting would be postponed. Germany still needed time to dissect the bailout schemed up by finance minister of the Euro zone.

The market feared that Germany might not execute what was being agreed upon at the Euro Group meeting yesterday with numerous points. Supposedly the voting would be postponed until all information on rescuing Greece ware completed. Besides, most probably transfer of profit from Greece bonds obtained by the European Central Bank (ECB) for the Athens administration was questioned by the German’s Central Bank.

The Deutsche Bundes bank claimed that they were more rightful over the profit obtained from the Greece bonds. Therefore, transfer of bond-based profit to Greece would pose an object of dispute in the future.

At the same time Rupiah was also getting negative sentiment from the report-on-inflation of the Bank of England (BoE) which was quite strong because the BOE was still expressing their worries over economic contraction in England although data of the latest GDP showed it was still growing by 1% for quarter III-2012.

This was not to mention remark made by one of the Fed’s executive who protested extension of Operation Twist which ended in December 2012. Besides opposition to increased purchase of mortgage-based bonds known as the third quantitative easing (QE-3) all in all it was negative sentiment for Rupiah.

Moreover economic data released by the US Government was reasonably positive, such as the Index of house price, consumers confidence index and manufacturing index. This confirmed performance of USD against other currencies which posed as pressures on Rupiah. All in all Rupiah inched down amidst value of USD which remained stationary against other main currencies but strengthening against Euro.

For this week, with better sentiment there was opportunity for Rupiah to strengthen to around Rp 9,580-Rp 9,620 per USD amidst Indonesia’s well-managed economy.


The Capital Market

The same hope was pinned on the performance of IHSG stocmarket, which was expected to pass the crucial point. After momentary slump to below the psychologic level of 45,300 finally IHSG settled at the level of 4,304.84. Meaning last Wednesday (28/11) index only weakened by 32.69 points (0.75%) against previous closing session.

This was most surprising; the point was that this deep sinking happened at the time when Uni Europe’s Finance Minister and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) agreed on Greece’s bailout fund amounting to Euro 44 billion. According to Olli Rheine, Monetary and Economic Commissioner of Uni Europe Greece would receive the bail out fund on December 13, 2012. Thankfully this good news would bring better future for Greece and Europe.

However it was not enough to console stockmarketplayers, while creditors agreed to axe credit interest rate and delay debt’s due date to 10 - 15 years. What was more heartening was that the Minister of Finance of Uni Europe had promised to extend Euro 240 billion Euro. Of that amount so far Greece had benefited bail out fund of Euro 150 billion.

Supposedly according to John Veter, the good news from Greece had its positive impact on IHSG. And why was it so hard for IHSG to consolidate? One thing was sure that downturn of indices was also happening in some other money markets of the world. In Wall Street, index of Dow Jones (DJIA) and Nasdaq both inched down by 0.69% and 0.30%.

Not just in America, downturn of index was also happening in shares of some Asian stockmarkets. Index of Hang Seng for instance, inched down by 0.62%. Weakening was also happening to Kospi (0.65%), Nikkei (1.22%) and Straits Times (0.09%) The turbulence in many stockmarkets probably accounted for weakness of IHSG.

It seemed that decline of some stocmarkets of the world was related to a series of occurrence happening in America. Last week Ben Bernanke, Governor of the Fed delivered his message about the fiscal cliff in the USA. Besides, in the near future there would be release on consumer confidence. While waiting for good news from America, investors from some stockmarkets were on a selling spree.

Some people believed Bernanke planned to announce stimulus of quantitative easing of fourth edition to inject more steam to America’s feeble economy as result of tax increase and austerity plan of President Barrack Obama, however some people regarded Bernanke as a person of high discipline and prudence.

The different opinions would certainly bring their own consequences. If Bernanke’s statement and release of consumer’s confidence in America were positive, IHSG was predicted to soar up. In the reserve case prices of shares would slump because the fiscal cliff policy, which was Obama’s invention, would drive America back to recession cliff.

If Bernanke was sure to execute the phase IV of quantitative easing it was time for investors to shop around because index would move in the range of 4,300 - 4,400 this week. Admittedly US stockmarket moved down during transaction on Wednesday (28/11) as investors were still worried about difficult negotiations over the fiscal cliff.

Investors stormed by the hordes to secure a safe position. Investors were responding to the statement of house members about the title progress in the effort to avoid the fiscal cliff. America was under the threat of recession with the increase of tax and budget saving as per January 1, 2013. The market was also anxiously waiting for data of house sales for October.

Some economists were expecting increase like last September. The market was also observing news about the Fed who would release Beige Book about the condition of regional economy. The release was expected to induce growth in spite of the Sandy hurricane.

Broadly speaking the threat of fiscal cliff would trouble the global stockmarkets. Europe’s stockmarkets inched down by 0.4%. Asia’s stockmarket was marked with downturn like index of Nikkei and Shanghai which continued to slip down. Index of Nikkei hit the lowest level in the past 4 years.

Back to BEI, apparently IHSG had risen by around 14.5% by year-to-sate up to November 26, 1012 last. Compared to other Asian stockmarkets, IHSG’s performance was in the fourth best position. Somehow the position slumped against that of early 2012.

In early 2012 last, Indonesia’s stockmarket was still in second position. Today IHSG was still below Thailand as champion of regional stockmarket with increase of 28.5%. Meanwhile India’s stockmarket flashed by 20% while index of Hong Kong, Hangseng rose by 18.6%.

With listed members numbering 460 this November, stock regulators were expecting increase of domestic contribution. Hence in case of turbulence in the capital market and global redemption, IHSG had the strength to keep from sinking too deeply or collapse so national economy would not be shaken. Stock market authorities were not too expectant that domestic investors would dominate ownership of shares.

Sector-wise, shares of the banking sector, consumer’s goods, construction and transportation would be the target of investors over the week. Banking and fiscal policy which was prudent would serve as catalyst for safeguarding IHSG in the range of 4,330 - 4,380 this week.

Business News - December 5, 2012

NOVEMBER 2012 INFLATION AT 0.07 PERCENT


Commodity price development in November 2012, in general, shows an increase. Based on result of survey of the National Bureau of Statistics (BPS) in 66 cities, in November 2012 inflation occurs at 0.07 percent or there is increase of Consumer Price Index (IHK) from 134.67 in October 2012 to 134.76 in November 2012. Inflation rate by calendar year (January - November) 2012 reaches 3.73 percent and inflation rate year-on-year (November 2012 against November 2011) reaches 4.32 percent.

Inflation occurs as a result of price increase as shown by increase of indices of some expenditure groups, namely ready-to-eat-foods, beverages, cigarettes, and tobacco group by 0.20 percent; housing, water, electricity, gas, and fuel group by 0.15 percent; health group by 0.21 percent; education, recreations, and sports group by 0.06 percent; and transportation, communication, and financial services group by 0.23 percent. While, expenditure groups experiencing deflation or down of indices are foodstuff group by 0.13 percent and clothing group by 0.10 percent.

Commodities experiencing price increase in November 2012 are, amongst other: shallots, rice, air transport tariff, beef, garlic, carrots, purebred chicken eggs, rice and side dishes, filter clove cigarettes, and wage of non-supervisor construction worker. While, commodities experiencing price decrease are: purebred chicken meat, red chili pepper, fresh fish, cayenne pepper, cooking oil, gold jewelry, French beans, string beans, water spinach, cucumber, tomatoes, and gasoline.

Commodity groups, which in November 2012, contribute to inflation are: ready-to-eat foods, beverages, cigarettes, and tobacco group at 0.04 percent: housing, water, electricity, gas, and fuel group 0.04 percent; health group 0.01 percent; education, recreations, and sport group 0.01 percent; and transportation, communications, and financial services group 0.03 percent. While, commodity groups contributing to deflation are: foodstuff group at 0.05 percent and clothing group 0.01 percent.

Foodstuff group in November 2012 experiences deflation at 0.13 percent or decrease of index from 159.12 in October 2012 to 158.91 in November 2012.

From 11 sub-groups under the foodstuff group, 7 sub-groups experience deflation and 4 sub-groups experience inflation. Sub-groups experience the highest deflation are: sub-groups of meat and products thereof at 2.32 percent, and the lowest is experienced by other foodstuff sub-groups at 0.07 percent. Sub-groups experiencing the highest inflation are condiment sub-group at 2.98 percent, and the lowest is experiences by fruit sub-group at 0.08 percent.

This group, in November 2012, contributes 0.05 percent to deflation. Commodities which dominantly contribute to deflation are, amongst others: purebred chicken meat 0.10 percent; red chili pepper 0.05 percent; fresh fish 0.03 percent; cayenne pepper and cooking oil 0.01 percent respectively. Commodities which dominantly contribute to inflation are: shallots 0.08 percent; rice 0.04 percent; beef and garlic 0.03 percent respectively; carrots 0.02 percent; and purebred chicken eggs 0.01 percent.

In November 2012, inflation occurs at a rate of 0.07 percent with Consumer Price Index (IHK) at 134.76. From 66 cities of IHK, in this month, 33 cities experience inflation and 33 cities experience deflation. The highest inflation occurs in Manado at 1.01 percent with IHK at 133.60, and the lowest occurs in Jember at 0.03 percent with IHK at 134.81. And, the highest deflation occurs in Manokwari at 0.96 percent with IHK at 147.31, and lowest occurs in Semarang, Tangerang, Mataram, and Singkawang at 0.01 percent respectively with IHK at 133.74; 135.87; 146.32; and 139.55 respectively. 


Business News - December 5, 2012 

IMPORT IN OCTOBER 2012 UP BY 12.16 PERCENT

1.    Oil & Gas and Non Oil & Gas Imports


Indonesia’s import value in October 2012 reaches USD 17,214.3 million or increases USD 1,865.7 million (12.16 percent) if compared to September 2012. This is due to increase in oil & gas import by USD 1,470.6 million (12.35 percent) and increases of oil & gas import by USD 395.1 million (11.48 percent). Furthermore, increase in oil & gas import is due to increase in import of crude oil and oil products by USD 294.9 million (37.86 percent) and USD 79.7 million (3.24 percent), respectively. While, oil & gas import of gas group also increases 10.01 percent or USD 20.5 million.

In January - October 2012, Indonesia’s import value reaches USD 159,180.4 million. It means that Indonesia’s import increases USD 13,614.4 million (9.35 percent) if compared to the same period of last year. Increases is experienced by oil & gas import by US 1,186.5 million or 3.53 percent. While oil & gas import also increases by USD 12,427.9 million (11.10 percent). More specially, increases in oil & gas import is mainly due to increase of import of crude oil and gas by USD 144.0 million (1.62 percent) and USD 1,278.3 million (109.51 percent), respectively. On the contrary, import of oil product declines USD 235.8 million or 1.00 percent.

2.    Non Oil & Gas Imports by Commodity Groups of the 2-Digit harmonized Tariff Schedule

In October 2012, Indonesia’s non oil & gas import value reaches USD 13,376.2 million. If compared to September 2012, import value of ten main non oil & gas import commodities in October 2012 experiences different amount of increases. Three commodity groups experience increase above USD 100.0 million, they are machinery and mechanical appliances by USD 315.4 million (13.26 percent), aircraft and parts thereof by USD 252.9 million (152.63 percent), and articles of iron and steel by USD 104.2 million (28.46 percent).

From the remaining seven commodity groups, five commodity groups experiences increase from USD 50 million to USD 100.0 million, they are electrical machinery and equipment by USD 95.8 million (6.40 percent), iron and steel by USD 95.0 million (12.56 percent), fertilizers by USD 89.9 million (61.37 percent), vehicles and parts thereof by USD 54.4 million (6.30 percent), and cereals by USD 50.3 million (17.03 percent). Two commodity groups experience increase by less than USD 50.0 million, they are plastics and articles thereof by USD 39.9 million (6.74 percent) and organic chemicals by USD 25.5 million (4.64 percent).

3.    Non Oil & Gas Imports by Main destination Countries of Origin


Indonesia’s total non oil & gas import  value in October 2012 reaches USD 13,376.2 million or increase USD 1,470.7 million (12.35 percent) is compared to September 2012. From the total import value, USD 2,705.8 million (20.23 percent) is from ASEAN and USD 1,248.2 million (9.33 percent) from Europe Union. By main countries of origin, non oil & gas import from China is the largest, reaching USD 2,483.7 million or 18.57 percent of Indonesia’s total non oil & gas import, followed by Japan at USD 2,042.6 million (15.27 percent), United States USD 1,160.3 million (8.67 percent), Thailand USD 1,019.7 million (7.62 percent), Singapore USD 859.9 million (6.43 percent), South Korea USD 765.8 million (5.73 percent), Malaysia USD 578.9 million (4.33 percent), Australia USD 443.9 million (3.32 percent), Taiwan USD 392.9 million (2.94 percent), Germany USD 376.0 million (2.81 percent), and India USD 314,4 million (2.35 percent). Non oil & gas import from Frances reaches USD 150.0 million (1.12 percent), and from United Kingdom reaches USD 137.8 million (1.03 percent). The thirteen main countries above contribute 80.19 percent to Indonesia’s total non oil & gas import.

Business News - December 5, 2012

EXPORT IN OCTOBER 2012 DOWN BY 1.45 PERCENT



1.    Oil & Gas and Non Oil & Gas Exports

Indonesia’s export in October 2012 declines 1.45 percent if compared to September 2012, or from USD 15,898.1 million to USD 15,667.3 million. If compared to October 2011, export declines 7.61 percent. Export decline in October 2012 is due to decline of non oil & gas export by 3.42 percent, from USD 13,127.6 million to USD 12,678.7 million, while oil & gas export increases by 7.87 percent from USD 2,770.5 million to USD 2,988.6 million. Moreover, increase in oil & gas export is due to increase of export of crude oil by 0.80 percent to USD 950.8 million.

And, export of oil products also increases 31.09 percent to USD 378.9 million and export of gas increases 7.84 percent to USD 1,658.9 million. Volume of oil & gas export in October 2012 against September 2012 for crude oil declines 6.27 percent, while export of oil product and gas increases 41.05 percent and 5.66 percent, respectively. Price of Indonesia’s crude oil in the global market declines from USD 11.02 per barrel in September 2012 to USD 109.85 per barrel October 2012.

2.    Non Oil & Gas Export by Commodity Groups of the 2-Digit harmonized Tariff Schedule

Largest decline in non oil & gas export in October 2012 against September 2012 is experienced by animal fats and oils (HS 15) by USD 519.2 million, and the largest increase is experience by mineral fuels (HS 27) by USD 254.2 million.

3.    Non Oil & Gas Export by Main destination Countries

Indonesia’s non oil & gas export in October 2012 to China, Japan, and United states reaches USD 1,821.8 million, USD 1,418.4 million and USD 1,154.0 million, respectively, and their total contribution reaches 34.66 percent.
 
Business News, December 5, 2012

SUBSITIZED FUEL OIL IN PILITICAL CONTEXT


The affirmation of the government readiness to supplement fuel subsidy has resulted in again issue related to mismanagement of subsidized fuel oil (BBM). If the government has so far asserted repeatedly the importance of budgetary saving in a bid to prevent state finance from running out, the addition of the subsidy funds triggers the reverse stream.

A number of facts in the field show that subsidized fuel is nit only a matter of state funds, which must be spent but also distribution and supervision. The first two issues (amount and fund) are relatively measurable but the two last issues always trigger problems in the field. Smuggling of subsidized fuel by parties in a bid to reap economic benefit should be considered as a factor causing subsidized fuel to run out quickly.

Subsidized fuel management has so far not resulted in an agreement. On one side, parties encourage actively the government to increase the price of subsidized fuel because the measure is deemed necessary to avoid the squandering in the state finance. In additional, the saved funds may be allocated to finance the development in infrastructure. The opinion is supported by assumption that most the subsidized fuel missed the target because it’s enjoyed by wealthy people. However, on the other hand, groups reject surreptitiously the plan to increase the price of subsidized fuel or withdraw fuel subsidy on account that subsidy constitutes a right of the whole people. Therefore, prohibition on wealthy people from using subsidized fuel is only appeal.

Fuel management develops to become a complicated, even extremely complicated issue because it’s driven intentionally or not into political domain. However, it’s difficult to categorize parties encouraging the reduction or abolition of fuel subsidy as parties not having political interest. The government is encourage intentionally to take measures, which are ascertained to draw reaction from the people but the government still determined to supplement subsidy fund also has political interest. It has become a public secret that fuel has strong political influence and the whole choices always bring political implication.

If the government really supplemented fuel subsidy funds (a choice extremely difficult to avoid), the state must withdraw around Rp 6 trillion to purchase around 1.1 million kilo liter of fuel to fulfill the need up to late this year. The amount is not surely few. If we talk about the promise of the government to save state budget, the additional subsidy amounting to Rp 6 trillion surely constitutes a kind of squandering even though the increase is executed on account of protecting the public interest. However, it may draw a question such as how much do the funds really fall on the hand of the poor? Conversely, how much do the funds go to the hand of the wealthy people urged to not use subsidized fuel so far and how much is the quantity of the smuggled fuel due to poor supervision?

The appearance of politics as commander, intentionally or not, causes the settlement of an issue categorized simple to be difficult to realize. It’s taking place now. SBY administration known rather favoring image building is determined to take the measure even though it would cause state finance in tatters for political interest. Amid the rising criticism, SBY regime and Democrat Party indeed must preserve their image to prevent their popularity from decreasing the eyes of the people prior to 2014.

Supplementing subsidized fuel funds surely would increase economic cost but raising the price must be paid by political cost. For a political regime, political cost tends to b avoided, instead of economic cost. Here, short-term political consideration closes the opportunity for the birth of long-term policy alternatives. It’s taking place now.

Business News - December 5, 2012